恶人谷

Several years ago a priest had a nationwide trip to debate with the biology professors in the universities. I was among the audience in one of his stops. The priest dominated the debate. The biologist professor said: you sound great just because you're more experienced in debate. The first problem I...

If a small joke is offensive here, I'll say sorry again. I didn't expect the effect at all.

Kids like to pretend to be grown ups. My babysitter told me: if you want to drive them crazy, ask them many many silly questions, or just call them grandma

Just kidding. Since you called me kid. I'm not even very young.

After reading Orange's post, my first problem is solved, not a problem anymore. Thank you very much. I should narrow my 3rd problem: 青壮期长 should has some advantages in some circumstances. I agree with you that if it inevitably makes longer infancy, then it also has serious disadvantages. This may or...

PS: I don't believe in God, I believe in science.

Sorry that I may have wasted a whole lot of time of you. Your replies helped me. Althought I still have some different opinions, I won't try to test your patience any more. Have a good day.

Maybe the mother nature does not need to care about backward compatibility or inter-changability. But just by chance, since there're so many species out there, and many of them do share many common features. If we get two long isolated groups together, shouldn't some of them be compatible? Quote: 可是...

That's like 'go read Bible, you'll understand.'

Tiffany,

Can you be more specific? Are apple and pear in the same Zhong3? Or they go to different categories at higher level in the hiarchy? If it's the second case, that doesn't affect my point.

I'm not biology major and can not be as acurate as you.

1。 举 例说吧 一些生物生活在相对封闭的环境，比如 澳 洲 . 人 类 打 破 这 环 境 的 间 隔 ，物 种 有 了 新 的 尝试 融 合 的 机 会 。 并 非 必 须 生 殖 上 完 全不 匹 配 才 能 称 为 不 同 种 。驴马 可 生 骡， 但 不 同 种。 2。 同 意 你 们的 看 法。 3。树 有 年 轮， 有 些 动 物 通 过 观 察 其 牙 齿 的 磨 损 可 推 测 年 龄 。化石 很 多 ， 人 类 对 古生 物 的 寿 命 是 有 了 解 的 。我“ 没 听 说 的 说 法 无 意 义。 应 小心 的 说 是 个人 观点 ： 越 让我 觉得 不对 ， 但 实际...

看到这里有高人，或许能解我百思不解之惑。 先接一下你们的话题。什么是有科学价值的理论？1-无逻辑错误 2-推出的结论能合理解释现有的现象，无抵触 3-能推出当时未知的结论，并得到证实。推出的结论越让人觉得荒谬，得到证明后越有价值，如相对论。 由此思路，我个人不承认圣经的科学价值。在此不展开说了。进化论逻辑严谨，能很好的解释许多生物现象。在第三点上或许有些争议。达尔文预言中间物种的化石会极多，易找。有人认为迄今找到的比预计的少很多，仍有关键环节的化石未找到。 我的问题是，基督徒对进化论的置疑真如方舟子所言不值一驳吗？他们提出的两个问题就难住了我： 1。 为什么今天所有物种之间都有严格的界限？为...