[闲聊]美女与钻石

入得谷来,祸福自求。
Post Reply
Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

[闲聊]美女与钻石

Post by Jun » 2007-01-25 7:59

太阳从西边出来了,Jun 要聊两个她从来不碰的话题。

冬天起床是一天最痛苦的时候,迷糊之中经常有希奇古怪的念头冒出来,今天的念头是:原来美貌之于女人,类似一颗大钻石之于穷光蛋。在平安富庶的社会环境里,从天而降的 一颗大钻石能给穷人带来好处,让他发达过上好日子,出人头地;在动荡贫穷的乱世就惨了,多半只能带来被强人觊觎,横尸后巷的下场,倒不如他的穷邻居朋友能保住平安命运。美女在文明和有秩序的环境里肯定比条件类似但相貌普通的常人好处多多,左右逢源,但是在恶劣的环境里(高度父权社会,女性被强烈压迫),命运多半会比平常女人更糟糕。我比较同意道家的看法,在森林被大砍特砍时,长得又高又直的树先被割倒,而生得七歪八扭的破树更容易幸存。

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2007-01-25 9:46

儒家的说法会叹息深山中的好木材没人用.......
美女生的美,在恶劣环境里,也还是有好处的。好比著名美人陈圆圆,她的一生是被人,主要是男人和人工非男人,当成一花瓶送来送去的一生。但是,她这个花瓶儿都是王侯将相家里摆着,恶劣环境中还给人保护的没给cei掉,不但没给cei掉,而且还照样儿美,而且还在不错的环境中得享天年。横向一比较的话,同时代多少不美的就倒毙了,能活的比她还长的就更少了。
乡音无改鬓毛衰

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2007-01-25 9:48

反对,这种消极看法是没有注意到问题的实质。首先钻石和美貌不能类比--钻石可以从一个人手里夺走,美貌只能随身携带。乱世中姿色平平的女人只能受命运摆布,被杀被奴隶,美女还有机会被当贡品送到较好的环境里去。至于薄命的那些美女,只能怪她们基因不好,不会抓住机会运用资本掐住命运的咽喉。最后我要从一个工程师的角度指出,这就好比一个软件,做的倍儿棒,不知道加防盗版的功能,光靠法律保护也不行。正确解决办法不是把软件做烂省的别人来盗,而是得加上密。穷人弄到大钻石,就应该赶紧去配把枪先。美女呢,都得象海上花里的黄翠凤周双玉一样,学精点。
有事找我请发站内消息

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2007-01-25 9:58

我这里不得不攒一下儿pClamp的防盗版技术啊!他们家那套程序基本上垄断了电生理实验室,一套卖的贼贵。为了防止一个系若干实验室分享一个程序,人家就装了个dangle,不插电脑上不能运行纪录程序。
乡音无改鬓毛衰

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2007-01-25 10:12

自我批评一下哈,我没把话说明白。穷人得大钻石,不能立刻兑现成钱,怎么买枪?再说光有枪也没用,尤其是从来没用过枪的不习惯暴力的人。如果不用钻石打比方,你可以想象一幅阁楼里的凡高也可以--不能吃不能穿不能立刻兑成现金而且有大把流氓觊觎。

我的比方是:穷人在乱世对--美女在强权男性社会,不是美女在乱世。你们眼睛就盯着那几个名人,陈圆圆,被各色各样的杀人如麻的土匪们轮流强奸,很开心吗?有好东西放在那里自然会吸引各色的流氓坏蛋流口水, 如果再处于vulnerable的地位就比没好东西更危险。但是如果不处于vulnerable 地位就是好事,例如女权高涨法制社会等于给拿钻石的穷人配了枪。

美女在父权专制的社会里遇到要占有她的人,力气和权力都比她强多了,还不是予取予求,精明比不精明稍微强一点,聊胜于无而已,要真能怎么样反抗也还是不能。

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2007-01-25 10:28

哇塞,你以为乱世里土匪还挑挑检检哪?他们逮到什么女人就强暴什么女人,跟长的美没关系的。只不过丑的就先奸后杀了。
美女在父权专制的社会里遇到要占有她的人,力气和权力都比她强多了,还不是予取予求,精明比不精明稍微强一点,聊胜于无而已,要真能怎么样反抗也还是不能。
强烈推荐你看海上花。男权社会里女人性自由当然很少,不能跟今天SATC 里SAM一样爱跟谁睡觉就跟谁睡觉。但是有手段的女人通过身体换取一定的控制,在生活上其他自由就比不精明的同类多.
例如女权高涨法制社会等于给拿钻石的穷人配了枪
要是女权高涨的社会,至少我希望长的美跟唱歌唱的好,篮球打的好一样,是个无关痛痒的特征,不是女人的第一特征,不是要当资本花的,也不用配枪防着。
有事找我请发站内消息

森林的火焰
Posts: 2913
Joined: 2005-09-08 9:45
Contact:

Post by 森林的火焰 » 2007-01-25 10:28

Jun说得是匹夫无罪,怀璧其罪的意思。
其实美女在盛世乱世比非美女能得到的资源都多,被人抢,被人送,经常是在男权社会的权力等级里一级级地向上传递。抛开心理不谈,就生理生活来说,过上好日子的机会比同样地位的非美女要高。非美女可能日子平安一些没那么多剌激。可是在乱世里谁又有平安日子呢?是美人,因为男人要,活下来的机会可能更高。其余的都”草杀“了。不见蒙古兵屠城么?点出巧手匠人,点出美貌妇女,剩下的全杀。
美女非美女的区别现在其实越来越小,现在的美女们把美貌当专业,做演员给大众看。因为大款也就那么几个,不能全娶了。另外一方面,一般人也过上了不错的日子,美人儿的日子过得再好,咱们羡慕一下就是了,不是朱门酒肉臭,路有冻死骨的那种差别。
http://harps.yculblog.com
搬家了搬家了

花差花差小将军
Posts: 2374
Joined: 2003-12-09 15:11

Post by 花差花差小将军 » 2007-01-25 10:29

The way I look at it is: it's just like money, you can tell people a thousand times that too much money is evil and will change people for the worse. But money is a good thing, a terrific thing if you take control not being controlled. Money might not eternally make you content, but will buy "temporary" happiness; wihout money is definitely going to guarantee inconvenience and misery, even to a saintly noble soul. Same thing applies to beauty, it's better to have than have not. But why are we worrying about this now?
脚翘黄天宝
光吃红国宝

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2007-01-25 10:36

Argh! I have still failed to convey this to you. I'm not talking about beautiful women in 乱世!

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2007-01-25 10:41

It is precisely NOT like money. Money can be put in a bank and spent little by little. You can invest and spend and manage money carefully. You can earn money through your own cunning and skills. It's somewhat within your control.

Let's say, 2 women walk down a dark alley in a neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro. One beautiful and sexy, one plain or even ugly. And the bad guys around, eyeing both of them, have no fear of the law. Who is more likely to get raped?

Or, a beautiful woman working in an office in a small city in China and her plain colleagues. Who is more likely to receive sexual harrassment from their unscrupulous male boss and his business partners? And I refuse to believe that a woman on the receiving end of such harrassment is happy and willing because she might get some extra perks from the favor bestowed on her. I refuse to side with the general opinion that envy those "kept women." (Ironic, isn't it, that women who are not as beautiful tend to look at the beautiful and used women with envy?)

It's like Sai4 Weng1 Shi1 Ma3. A nicer horse is more likely to be captured and put in harness. A healthy boy is more likely to be drafted to fight in the war.

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2007-01-25 10:47

See, that's exactly where you are thinking like a woman. The bad guys might just gang rape both if they could. You are making the classic mistake that a rapist rapes because the victim iss desirable and has aroused him at that moment (and if she were plain he wouldn't want to), while in fact, it has more do to with control and ...she just happens to be there when he wants to rape.

Sexual harrassment is even more about power and control than about beauty of the subject than rape, for it is much longer process that usually lasts over a period of time.

I am going to stop replying. I can't believe you actually think so. It is such an obvious attempt to piss us off and get us to debate with you. :whistling: :f28: :wavy: :wavy: :wavy:
有事找我请发站内消息

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2007-01-25 10:50

Oh come on! Are you kidding? Do you really believe that harrassers and rapists do not favor more beautiful objects? Getting aroused have nothing to do with the most primitive sense of what's desirable in the opposite sex?

Popular psychobabble infected with wishful-thinking shallow feminism likes to claim that rape of women and sexual harrassment is ALL about power and NONE about primitive human urges. I think it's baloney. Given the choice, a bad guy (I am not talking about all men!) would prefer the younger, sexier, more desirable object that appeals more to his hard-wired human instincts.

花差花差小将军
Posts: 2374
Joined: 2003-12-09 15:11

Post by 花差花差小将军 » 2007-01-25 10:59

OK, what are we trying to achieve here? I agree that even when I go grocery shopping I prefer to choose neatly-processed meats and more lively fish to be killed. But that doesn't mean I would go out find the pretty girls and pursuade them to cut their faces and destroy their natural blessings so that they won't be eaten or violated just in case.
This is my last response too.
脚翘黄天宝
光吃红国宝

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2007-01-25 11:00

that doesn't mean I would go out find the pretty girls and pursuade them to cut their faces and destroy their natural blessings so that they won't be eaten or violated just in case.
Neither do I. Just for the record. We are living in good times after all.

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2007-01-25 11:45

这个东西是这样的,每个人的口味不同,容貌身材等等硬件儿条件,是没有一个量化标准说:这个美那个不美的。所以才有王八绿豆看对眼儿的粗俗说法。我的point是什么呢?我的point是一个女的碰到倒霉事儿,是因为她倒霉,而不是因为她硬件儿条件的原因。

说道钱,其实我觉得坚持说金钱邪恶的大部分都是穷人。
乡音无改鬓毛衰

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2007-01-25 12:56

白博的意思是,我说美丽的外表不是好事,是我长得难看所以嫉妒了。这个。。。我倒不敢说一定没这回事。。。其实是有可能的,或许是我的理论只是嫉妒美女的结果。实际上我本来也说在平安年代,得了钻石的穷人当然比没得好。在一个或多或少尊重女性的环境里,美女的好处自然超过了丑女或者普通人。

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2007-01-25 13:09

jun这种事情千万不要谦虚,不论是否美女,拿出美女的作派来,就能受到美女的待遇---我发现,最近,自己怎么看自己直接影响周围人怎么看自己。

金钱和美女是两个分开的话题,咱得分开讨论。从历史上来看,第一个提出富人进天堂比骆驼穿针眼还难的894耶稣基督?穷人。然后说金钱是万恶之源的那个家伙也不富。然后社会主义的思想家马克思似乎也挺穷的。但是貌似中国人的思路不太一样,一直就比较看重做官。
乡音无改鬓毛衰

森林的火焰
Posts: 2913
Joined: 2005-09-08 9:45
Contact:

Post by 森林的火焰 » 2007-01-25 13:58

因为在中国做官一定能来钱,有钱人不一定做得了官。
http://harps.yculblog.com
搬家了搬家了

洛洛
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2003-12-05 12:35

Post by 洛洛 » 2007-01-25 14:07

tiffany wrote:但是貌似中国人的思路不太一样,一直就比较看重做官。
我跟鬼子解释福禄寿三星的时候,福寿他们都很好理解,但是禄就很费嘴皮子的说。
我觉得这个话题不全面,因为只写了美女和不是美女的考量。我们是以不是美女(但还看得过去)的角度来看的,但是如果在丑的被翻白眼处处碰钉子甚至被歧视的丑女眼里,也许她就不是这么想的。
混坛上另一颗新星
luoluo11.ycool.com

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2007-01-25 17:15

或许是我的理论只是嫉妒美女的结果
不是不是,你的结论来自(1)想得太多(2)你以为男人跟你想得一样。

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2007-01-26 22:06

我不行了,对Stephen Colbert的本事有了新的敬仰。It's damned hard to argue for something I don't believe in.

至少,我可以为自己辩护说,我并不是要欺骗别人,而是想试一试 stretch my mind. 我就不能设身处地地想象一下跟我意见相反的人的理论吗?即使他们是错的,也有自圆其说的方面吧?

但是上面我自己提出的假设,最终还是不能自圆其说,只好收回。

小K说得对,rape 跟爱慕美女毫无关系。即使不在乱世,rapists也不会搞什么挑三拣四,他们并不是因为受害者挑逗了他们,被美貌吸引,才激发了犯罪和暴力的欲望。rapists的动机本来就是滋长在他们自己内心的黑暗的不受控制的力量,跟外界的因素无关,跟受害者本身也没有直接关系,只要对方是女的便可。It's not about the victim or any outside stimuli, but it's about the perpetrator himself. The violence and the twisted urge come from somewhere deep down inside: sometimes it's a hate and disgust for all women, sometimes it's a deeply rooted sense of inadequacy. 这是真的,有许多数据和实例证明。并不是热卖小说编造出来的理论。

我在上面胡说八道的时候,没计划 got carried away, 但是我不想让错误的说法放在公众场合,万一遗害误导就惨了。故此声明和道歉。

:doh:

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2007-01-31 13:51

:spamafote: I knew it :f28: :f28:
有事找我请发站内消息

Post Reply