[分享]华盛顿邮报:联邦司法部大规模犯法

入得谷来,祸福自求。
Post Reply
Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

[分享]华盛顿邮报:联邦司法部大规模犯法

Post by Jun » 2008-07-28 16:49

有谁再跟我说美国是司法国家我就跟他急。

这国家都给治成这样儿了,人民还乐呵呵地拥护领导,真是叹为观止,热爱共和党热爱GWB的人deserve what they get. 移民案件堆积如山,大家都别想拿到绿卡或者入籍,也别怪别人。
Justice Officials Repeatedly Broke Law on Hiring, Report Says

By Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 28, 2008; 4:02 PM

Former Justice Department counselor Monica M. Goodling and former chief of staff D. Kyle Sampson routinely broke the law by conducting political litmus tests on candidates for jobs as immigration judges and line prosecutors, according to an inspector general's report released today.

Goodling passed over hundreds of qualified applicants and squashed the promotions of others after deeming candidates insufficiently loyal to the Republican party, said investigators, who interviewed 85 people and received information from 300 other job seekers at Justice. Sampson developed a system to screen immigration judge candidates based on improper political considerations and routinely took recommendations from the White House Office of Political Affairs and Presidential Personnel, the report said.

Goodling regularly asked candidates for career jobs: "What is it about George W. Bush that makes you want to serve him?" the report said. One former Justice Department official told investigators she had complained that Goodling was asking interviewees for their views on abortion, according to the report.

In one case, Goodling refused to extend the temporary assignment of a prosecutor because of her "perception of the [lawyer's] sexual orientation," according to the report.

Taking political or personal factors into account in employment decisions for career positions violates civil service laws and can run afoul of ethics rules. Investigators said today that both Goodling and Sampson had engaged in "misconduct."

The improper personnel moves deprived worthy candidates of promotions and damaged the credibility of the Justice Department, investigators wrote. An experienced counterterrorism prosecutor, for example, was kept from advancing in favor of a more junior lawyer who lacked a background in terrorism.

The procedures imposed on immigration judge candidates caused serious delays in appointing judges at a time when the courts suffered under a heavy workload, the report said.

Goodling, who resigned in 2007 amid a scandal over the department's politicized hiring, is a central figure in the long-running investigation into the way politics infused decision-making at the department. Sampson, who had served as a top aide to former Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, also left the department last year and now works at a law firm in the Washington area.

The Justice Department IG's report, released this morning, cites several other workers who may have engaged in misconduct by using political or sexual orientation to screen candidates for immigration judgeships. It also cites instances in which current and former Justice employees, including one-time press aide and political appointee John Nowacki, may not have been candid with investigators.

Nowacki, who is on assignment in Iraq, could not be reached for comment this morning.

The extensive report confirms the long-held suspicions of congressional Democrats and underscores the challenge the next president will face in restoring public confidence in the nation's premiere law enforcement operation.

In a statement, current Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey said the department had already moved to institute changes to the hiring process and said he would consider more in light of today's report.

"Even as I commend the hard work and collaboration of the Justice Department's Offices of Inspector General and Professional Responsibility on today's report, I am of course disturbed by their findings that improper political considerations were used in hiring decisions relating to some career employees," Mukasey said. "I have said many times, both to members of the public and to Department employees, it is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career Department employees."

Goodling, a former operative at the Republican National Committee and a graduate of the Regent University law school, founded by Christian televangelist Pat Robertson, declined to be interviewed by investigators working for the inspector general and the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility. The investigators said they lacked the power to compel her to cooperate because she had left the department.

But she did testify before Congress in May 2007, under a grant of immunity from prosecution. Before the House Judiciary Committee, a shaken Goodling told lawmakers that "the best I can say is that I know I took political considerations into account on some occasions." She said she did not intend to break the law at the time.

"I did not hold the keys to the kingdom," she demurred.

John M. Dowd, a lawyer for Goodling, did not return several phone messages.

Bradford Berenson, a lawyer for Sampson, said Sampson interceded several times to oppose the use of political criteria in hiring.

"With respect to immigration judges, he believed in complete good faith that they were not career civil service positions and that political criteria could be taken into account," Berenson said.

Today's study marks the second of four lengthy dissections of the role that partisan political considerations played in Justice Department employment decisions during the Bush administration. Reports on hiring problems in the Civil Rights Division and the firing of nine U.S. attorneys have yet to be released.

Wednesday, Inspector General Glenn A. Fine will testify about his findings before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Last month, Fine disclosed that hundreds of candidates for summer law intern and elite entry-level honors program jobs had been excluded from hiring pools because of their Democratic affiliations or membership in environmental and social justice groups.

Fine said this morning that "high-quality candidates for important department positions [had been] rejected because of improper political considerations."

Senior Senate Democrats last week sent a letter to Mukasey asking him to exercise "vigilance" to ensure that unqualified political appointees do not wheedle their way into career civil service jobs in the waning months of the president's term.

This morning, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) called the political interference "widespread" and said it "could not have been done without at least the tacit approval of senior Department officials."

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said today he had directed his staff to consider whether he should issue a criminal perjury referral, based on alleged misstatements by Goodling, Sampson and Gonzales to Congress.

"Apparently the political screening was so pervasive that even qualified Republican applicants were rejected . . . because they were 'not Republican enough' for Monica Goodling and others," Conyers said.
此喵已死,有事烧纸

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2008-07-29 7:54

听说没有?小布什给下任总统留下来400比林的赤字,还不包括打仗的开销!
乡音无改鬓毛衰

洛洛
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2003-12-05 12:35

Post by 洛洛 » 2008-07-29 8:05

美国国债不是一向赤字吗?不过我不觉得下任总统会好很多,很多问题,比如医疗,都是积重难返,但是现在的选举制度下(包括参众两院)都是只看着眼前的问题,头痛医头,脚痛医脚得来定政策。
混坛上另一颗新星
luoluo11.ycool.com

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2008-07-29 8:08

没有啦,小克总统最后一个任期赤字没有了。。。。
真希望下一个总统是个致力于和善于发展经济的总统啊!
乡音无改鬓毛衰

silkworm
Posts: 4776
Joined: 2004-01-09 20:45

Post by silkworm » 2008-07-29 8:17

据我老板的阴谋论观点:共和党就根本不想消除赤字,他们打仗就是看小克留下的surplus太多了,那么多钱在那里,就得给穷人办事,给大众免费看病,他们急死了,赶紧打仗花钱,还能给自家的公司增加收入,不打简直对不起上帝。

另,我们一个拐弯合作项目的人跟军方有点关系,那天开会时说,现在不用soldier这个字了,改用war fighter,比较广泛,适用所有人员。我逗我老板,你现在也算一员war fighter。他苦着脸摇头。

森林的火焰
Posts: 2913
Joined: 2005-09-08 9:45
Contact:

Post by 森林的火焰 » 2008-07-29 9:36

不是说400比林是最先估计的数字,现在要估成490比林么?
钱山钱海啊 :shock: 什么时候达到一摩尔钱就牛大发了。
http://harps.yculblog.com
搬家了搬家了

海阔天空
Posts: 386
Joined: 2004-05-05 19:36

Post by 海阔天空 » 2008-07-29 10:30

很多美国人根本就不管什么打不打仗之类的事情,他们头脑简单:“谁不加税选谁。”

可是,大家都没工作,就算没有税,又有啥用?不加税,政府又要打仗,又要增加这个那个的支出,谁出钱?

打仗这个事情,政府出钱打,然后某些公司赚钱。

还有现在拯救房地美和房丽美,比邻比邻的账单哇,而且还不说然后有什么整顿措施。这个意思不就是:你们尽管冒风险哈,挣了钱归你们的,赔了钱归政府的。
Beyond

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-07-29 10:42

房地美和房丽美不拯救也不行哇。他们倒了没人发房贷。没房贷就没人能买房子。没人能买房子房市就崩溃。
你以为你已经买了房子不打算卖就跟你没关系?关系大了去了。周围的房子卖不掉被荒弃会把整个区整个城拖下来,无家可归率增高,犯罪率增高,生存环境恶化,很快连让孩子在屋后草坪玩都不敢了。
Last edited by Knowing on 2008-07-29 10:42, edited 1 time in total.
有事找我请发站内消息

洛洛
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2003-12-05 12:35

Post by 洛洛 » 2008-07-29 10:42

这个house bill 对按时交mortgage的屋主也不公平。
混坛上另一颗新星
luoluo11.ycool.com

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2008-07-29 10:46

房地美和房丽美要是不救的话,据说就该世界性经济衰退了。。。
乡音无改鬓毛衰

森林的火焰
Posts: 2913
Joined: 2005-09-08 9:45
Contact:

Post by 森林的火焰 » 2008-07-29 11:04

这叫“capitalize the profit and socialize the loss"。
http://harps.yculblog.com
搬家了搬家了

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-07-29 11:19

政府掏钱都是从哪儿掏出来的?为什么除了富人以外,美国工薪阶层在过去十年里 (adjusted) 收入水平完全没有增长?(如果计算医疗保险还下降了。)工人(包括我们这样的白领)制造的财富都跑到哪里去了?不仅我们自己,而且你们这些有孩子的,支持共和党,支持GWB 就等于把儿女卖了。
此喵已死,有事烧纸

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2008-07-29 11:20

多数经济问题其实不是政府应该管的. 但很多, 尤其是税收政策, 实在太坏了. 美国过分依赖个人收入税了, 又把TAX CODE搞的那么复杂, 平白增加了那么多OVERHEAD. 税收政策也过分倾向个人拥有自住房了, 很多人就是不该买房的, 为什么非要浪费纳税人的钱鼓励呢?
现在这个BILL完全是选举年的作秀, 银行又不傻, 不会赔钱陪着, 外国投资者也不傻, 这么乱印钱, 长期债卷一定跌, 长期利率只会越来越高, 大家还是没法买房, 房市继续跌, FORECLOSURE只会更多. 市场利率通货膨胀这么高, 特别发的贷款需要填的亏空更大.整个一恶性循环.

silkworm
Posts: 4776
Joined: 2004-01-09 20:45

Post by silkworm » 2008-07-29 11:33

我看这Monica Goodling也就是他们抛出的替罪羊。

这人1973年生人,“a 1991 graduate of Northeastern High School in Manchester, Pennsylvania, and received her Bachelor of Arts degree in 1995 from Messiah College. She received her Juris Doctor degree in 1999 from Regent University Law School, founded by Pat Robertson”

这经历能那么快坐那么高的职位。
反正肯定不是她一手遮天造成这些局面的,还不是上面授意。

洛洛
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2003-12-05 12:35

Post by 洛洛 » 2008-07-29 11:44

Knowing wrote:周围的房子卖不掉被荒弃会把整个区整个城拖下来,无家可归率增高,犯罪率增高,生存环境恶化,很快连让孩子在屋后草坪玩都不敢了。
现在房子卖不掉还是因为价钱太高,大家收入没有怎么增加,房价是五年前的两倍,十年前的三四倍,不用“CREATIVE LOAN”,大多数人再辛勤工作都买不起。而且过去几年新屋建商有很多优惠税收政策,大盖房子,增加了某些地区房屋市场的供应量。如果房价真地降了,很多人还是要买房子的。
混坛上另一颗新星
luoluo11.ycool.com

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-07-29 11:52

如果突然停止发放房贷,房子即使半价又多少人能付的起现金?想买都不能买。今年早些时候,大约四月底五月初的时候,很多银行都基本停顿了业务,"哪怕你是教皇都拿不到贷款"。我不是吓唬人。房地美和房丽美停业就那么可怕。

你们太相信市场了,觉得市场总能纠正自己。长期来说是,但是纠正自己要有流通性才能纠正。而市场的流通性没你们想的那么好。短期完全可能出现过度收紧一切都停顿的现象。
Last edited by Knowing on 2008-07-29 11:57, edited 1 time in total.
有事找我请发站内消息

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-07-29 11:54

反正肯定不是她一手遮天造成这些局面的,还不是上面授意。
这还用说么?

从上烂到下。

挟?报复,出卖CIA 情报员,难道是狗腿小人物 Scooter Libby 自己主动干的?傻子才信。
此喵已死,有事烧纸

orangetabby
Posts: 310
Joined: 2003-12-06 12:59

Post by orangetabby » 2008-07-29 12:10

房地美和房丽美在目前的情况下确实是要救的。否则就象小K说的那样子,要崩盘了。

但是情况基本稳定下来之后,希望能够开始改革,首先是严格禁止这两家再到议会LOBBY,他们LOBBY真的很恶劣。
然后缩小规模,该裁人裁人,该走人走人。事情做得不好,没办法大家忍着气出钱给他们收拾烂摊子。换人做做也很应该。
性格决定命运, 基因决定性格. 所以请放心大胆的怨天怨地怨爹娘.

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2008-07-29 12:10

现在贷款二级市场买主基本只有几家联邦机构了.今年的房贷80%多是二房放的钱,剩下的还有FHA和VA. 基本没有银行自己留着放出去的房贷, 都跟烫手山芋一样扔给政府机构. 就光应付原有的贷款还来不及呢.
这个BILL还是象征性大, 二房执行起来条件收的很紧, 我想长远是好的,风险在下降. 我不满意的是FHA和VA, 为什么有人3%甚至不到的头款要纳税人补贴买房子?对纳税人不公平, 对这些贷款人也不是好事, 他们就不该买自己不能负担的房子, 这不是鼓励他们给自己背上沉重负担么? 总的说来我对做秀的援助低收入买房的例子都持怀疑态度. 看看这个HGTV援助后的FORECLOSURE:
http://www.mercurynews.com/realestate/ci_10023727
援助完了他们自己把钱贷出来干别的, 然后就FORECLOSURE了.

洛洛说的是DC吧, 弯曲有的地方, 跌回99年了.

海阔天空
Posts: 386
Joined: 2004-05-05 19:36

Post by 海阔天空 » 2008-07-29 12:29

我没有反对拯救房地美和房丽美。NPR(我最近天天绕城开两圈接送孩子,听了不少。。。)打了个比方:你下班回家,儿子跟你说,爸,我出去赌博,输了两万块,人家让我今天还钱,不还就把我腿打断。

当爹的能不还钱?但是当爹的一定会说:“我今晚把钱给你,但是赌博这件事情,let's talk about it in the morning。”

明早再说这个部分,是这个bill里欠缺的。

我瞧着美国政府解决这个房地产危机,一方面是政府拍着胸脯说一切有我兜着,把信心部分撑起来;另一方面就是跟中国似的,大规模通胀,把房地产的泡沫消失在通胀的泡沫当中。

说到底,都是把财富从大众手中转移到极小部分人手中。
Beyond

洛洛
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2003-12-05 12:35

Post by 洛洛 » 2008-07-29 12:43

我同意两房的部分,但是其他很多条款我不知道怎么行得通。比如转借低息贷款,现在的要求是房主没有EQUITY LOAN(很多美国人都有),房贷占GROSS INCOME31%以上――按照保守老中的算法,交税再去掉三分之一,另外三分之一又要日常开支又要应付紧急支出,不foreclosure才怪。
混坛上另一颗新星
luoluo11.ycool.com

qinger
Posts: 5805
Joined: 2003-12-24 15:09

Post by qinger » 2008-07-29 15:34

我很反对帮那些要foreclosure的人。明明付不起贷款为什么要买房, 都是这些人把房价托得高高的, 现在害得我们这些老老实实的人买不起房子。回头再拿我们交的税去填他们的窟窿。真岂有此理。
现在偶是胡军的扇子。

qinger
Posts: 5805
Joined: 2003-12-24 15:09

Post by qinger » 2008-07-29 16:30

我原来觉得Obama没戏,都是在网上看的关于大选支离破碎的消息, 昨天看了电视上两个人活生生的形象, 对Obama信心大增。 Mccain一暮气沉沉的糟老头子, 怎么看也不会太受欢迎, 相比之下Obama简直是“剥了皮都会动。”
现在偶是胡军的扇子。

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-07-29 19:30

大家要是都象青儿就好了。。。满足的说。 :mrgreen:
有事找我请发站内消息

Post Reply