废物利用

入得谷来,祸福自求。
Post Reply
Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

废物利用

Post by Knowing » 2008-12-18 12:30

Credit Suisse Group AG’s investment bank has found a new way to reduce the risk of losses from about $5 billion of its most illiquid loans and bonds: using them to pay employees’ year-end bonuses.

:mrgreen:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... refer=home
有事找我请发站内消息

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2008-12-18 12:58

:mrgreen:
其实现在是抄底.

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-12-18 13:04

一抄就是八年。。。。 :mrgreen:
让我想起改革早期电扇厂倒闭下岗工人一人发十几台电扇回家的故事。。
有事找我请发站内消息

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-12-18 14:15

Did you hear?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01556.html
The Bush administration today issued a sweeping new regulation that protects a broad range of health-care workers -- from doctors to janitors -- who refuse to participate in providing services that they believe violate their personal, moral or religious beliefs.

The controversial rule empowers federal health officials to cut off federal funding for any state or local government, hospital, clinic, health plan, doctor's office or other entity if it does not accommodate employees who exercise their "right of conscience." It would apply to more than 584,000 health-care facilities.
Women's health advocates, family planning proponents, abortion rights activists, members of Congress and others condemned the regulation, saying it would create major obstacles to a variety of health services, including abortion, family planning, end-of-life care and possibly a wide range of scientific research.
Although the Obama administration could reverse the rule, it would require a lengthy process. Last month, however, Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Patty Murphy (D-Wash.) introduced a bill to repeal the regulation legislatively.
保护和鼓励医务人员以"良心"为名拒绝开避孕药,Plan B紧急避孕药,RU486,提供 family planning service,应垂危病人要求不进行主动治疗,如此等等。
The 127-page rule is the latest in a flurry of federal regulations that the administration is implementing before President Bush's term ends, including a number that would weaken government protections for consumers and the environment.
此喵已死,有事烧纸

tiffany
Posts: 24866
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:59

Post by tiffany » 2008-12-18 14:22

those bonus may really be the retirement money, me being VERY optimistic
乡音无改鬓毛衰

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-12-18 14:25

Although the Obama administration could reverse the rule, it would require a lengthy process. Last month, however, Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Patty Murphy (D-Wash.) introduced a bill to repeal the regulation legislatively.
F__k them. We have time. We will reverse the rule, no matter how long it takes. :preston_robot_nocollar: :preston_robot_nocollar:
有事找我请发站内消息

camellia
Posts: 1146
Joined: 2003-12-04 19:17

Post by camellia » 2008-12-18 14:27

Plan B已经是OTC了,幸好。

dropby
Posts: 10921
Joined: 2003-11-24 12:23

Post by dropby » 2008-12-18 14:28

我觉得美国总统权力太大了。是不是应该从制度上加以改革,让总统不可以有这么大权力?为什么这种regulation不需要议会先通过?

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-12-18 14:31

camellia wrote:Plan B已经是OTC了,幸好。
It is not entirely OTC. If the pharmacist at your local store refuses to carry it in the store or refuses to sell it to you, you can't get it. It happens a lot in "corn field" states.
此喵已死,有事烧纸

dropby
Posts: 10921
Joined: 2003-11-24 12:23

Post by dropby » 2008-12-18 14:41

美国总统真威风,加拿大的总理真可怜。当初通过同性恋婚姻合法化虽然自由党是多数党,但也以不投赞成票就不能继续当阁员进行威胁才通过。本地的一个华人议员就是竞选的时候反对同性恋,投票的时候贪恋阁员位置投了赞成票,后来大选就给选下去了。

少数党政府就不用说了,动不动有下台的危险。最近就吓得干脆求总督把议会给休会了。

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-12-18 14:44

我们发达地区爽了,可以赶紧大力发展邮购业务,向保守地区推销这些东西,让他们用不用都买点存着,别临时出门本地药店不肯卖。plan b 吃早吃晚失败率可不一样. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

纽约今年惨透了,税收锐减,我们市长正说要大力发展多种经济,不能再光依赖花儿街这头大奶牛。下一个发展重点这就有了!
有事找我请发站内消息

qinger
Posts: 5805
Joined: 2003-12-24 15:09

Post by qinger » 2008-12-18 14:57

今年有的公司给员工的圣诞礼物是每人charity donation credit若干。
现在偶是胡军的扇子。

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2008-12-18 15:20

dropby wrote:我觉得美国总统权力太大了。是不是应该从制度上加以改革,让总统不可以有这么大权力?为什么这种regulation不需要议会先通过?
9494, 在造新神之前, 应该纠正小布和切尼开的坏例子.
而且国会过去几年都干啥了.

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-12-18 15:27

来不及了,小豪,两院都在民主党手里,你听天由命的祈祷帅哥是一粒正直的不滥用权力的好人儿吧!狰狞的说 :mrgreen:
有事找我请发站内消息

Elysees
Posts: 6813
Joined: 2003-12-05 13:10

Post by Elysees » 2008-12-18 19:48

qinger wrote:今年有的公司给员工的圣诞礼物是每人charity donation credit若干。
啧,贵人公司去年就开始这么干了。
话说,今年我跟他参加他们公司的YEP,往年一入门或者是脱衣舞女(厄,我是说,穿得很少的跳蛇舞的靓女)啥啥的跟人合影打招呼,今年一进门,我转头一看,居然看到杨致远在跟人合影,再仔细一看,一排站过去什么David 啥啥夫妇,Sue Decker什么的。我感叹说,经济真是不济,居然换他们迎客。
我自横刀向天笑,笑完我就去睡觉。

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2008-12-19 22:38

布什干嘛还工作的休假去多好,省得弄这些破regulations. :uhh:
不过我听说这个布什这个瘸腿鸭子新发下的regulation得等三十天才能生效并得由议会审查。 如果议会不喜欢,两房以多数票反对+新总统签字就可把它推翻。
Image

Post Reply