Page 1 of 1
科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 10:57
by Jun
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 195234.htm
昨儿看见一条新闻,有人重复了二十世纪初生物学家 Paul Kammerer 的试验。 Kammerer 属拉马克派进化论,认为后天努力而获得的有利特征能够遗传下去,并且提出一些试验结果证明自己的理论。数据发表后,被人发现有伪造成果之嫌疑,舆论大哗,令他颜面和career都一败涂地,他自杀而死。
直到最近几年研究 epigenetics 大热,很多他曾描述的现象跟现在的发现有类似之处。虽然不能肯定地替他平反,但肯定了他的某些报告的真实性,只不过他太超前时代了。
Re: 科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 14:28
by tiffany
我科学的指出,不能因为结论(可能)正确,就忽视论据的(

不)可靠性。
Re: 科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 15:24
by Jun
tiffany wrote:我科学的指出,不能因为结论(可能)正确,就忽视论据的(

不)可靠性。
我的意思不是说他的结论正确,现在的证据也未必证明他没有伪造(某些)数据,但是说明他很有可能收集到了真实的证据。我猜说不定当时无法重复duplicate,一急之下伪造了一些新证据,也是有可能的。总之,不管怎么样,这自杀都太冤了。
Re: 科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 18:57
by tiffany
jun, u r one big softie!

Re: 科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 19:02
by Jun
Yes, too soft to do hard science!

Re: 科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 19:27
by tiffany
说真的,做科学的话有一件事万万不能做,那就是伪造数据。(画外音,做就做了,就是万万不能给抓住)
这个东西就是,不伪造的数据发表出来人人还心存疑惑,要借鉴的话一定会本实验室重复一下儿才能继续往下做;给人抓到了,以后就不要混科学这一行啦。
Re: 科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 19:34
by Jun
说道伪造数据,想起前几天看见的一个 blog (忘了从哪儿看来的),好搞笑。
http://www.margaretsoltan.com/?p=16578
哥伦比亚大学(是纽约的那个名校,不是中美洲小国的大学)研究发现不认识的人给怀孕困难的女性祈祷能够大大提高当事人的怀孕几率!
后来发现全是伪造的。但是没关系,作者之一继续当他的哥大医学院妇产科教授。
Wow! Psychology Today excitedly revealed, back in 2002, the results of a Columbia University study which showed that if people pray for infertile women undergoing in vitro treatment, the women they pray for double their chances of getting pregnant. “Women who were prayed for had a 50 percent pregnancy rate, compared with a 26 percent success rate among those for whom no one prayed.”
We’re not talking here about your local priest or your canasta partner kneeling in the neighborhood church — in this “amazing” study, total strangers thousands of miles away from the Korean women involved (none of the women were told they were experimental subjects) prayed to anonymous photos of them….
And that wasn’t all! “Instead of merely having a group of people pray for the women attempting to get pregnant,” a scientist who reviewed the experiment remarked, “the study had one group doing that, a second group praying to help the first group, and a third group praying that ‘God’s will or desire be fulfilled for the prayer participants’ in the first two groups.” Kind of a chain letter thing.
This impressive protocol and its stunning results blew Roger [sometimes rendered Rogerio] Lobo, chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Columbia’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, right out of the uterine sac. “The results were so highly significant they weren’t even borderline. We spent time deciding if it was even publishable because we couldn’t explain it.”
But publish it they did, in the eminent Journal of Reproductive Medicine, and there it sat amid swelling media coverage, until various scientific oversight agencies took a look at it.
At which point the swelling went down. Efforts to talk to the three principals about it have not gone well. “One of the authors,” writes an observer, “has left the university and refuses to comment, another now claims to have not actually participated in the study and also refuses to comment [that‘d be Lobo, who now says he just put his name on the study -- a common and scandalous scientific practice that no one finds scandalous], and another is on his way to federal prison for fraud.”
That’d be veteran conman Daniel P. Wirth, about to spend five years in jail for too many crimes to mention here. Wirth has no medical degree, but did purchase a diploma mill masters in parapsychology, spiritual healing, and therapeutic touch. Before the pregnancy study, Wirth’s research involved amputating salamander limbs and then waving his hands over the salamanders to make their limbs grow back.
Five years later, Lobo remains a Columbia University professor in excellent standing.
Re: 科学惨史
Posted: 2009-09-05 19:41
by tiffany
天哪,这种文章没人认真的。该人估计在圈子里已经是个笑话儿了。
