Page 1 of 1

Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-14 13:22
by simonsun
June 19 @ 8pm

http://www.isepp.org/

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-14 13:50
by Jun
The retired editor says, his name is Hawking not Hawkins. :mrgreen:

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-14 13:54
by tiffany
:mrgreen: 西门去完了回来给我们进行科普汇报

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-14 14:06
by 笑嘻嘻
我也收到广告了。霍金最近很缺钱吗?又上the big bang theory ,又来演讲。不过据说他是看the big bang theory的。 :mrgreen:

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-14 14:20
by tiffany
说到hawking我就联想起来了哈勃望远镜,nasa缺钱吧,最近,这么落力科普,贴了1000多张哈勃照片儿,真漂亮啊.

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-14 15:13
by Jun
Hubble不是退下了么?Webber上去了没?孙同学给咱 update 一下。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 1:00
by simonsun
Jun wrote:Hubble不是退下了么?Webber上去了没?孙同学给咱 update 一下。
What? You retired already? So now all you do is sipping coconut water and watching cute boys skating? :mrgreen:

Hubble is still running, and Webb won't be launched till 2018, if it can be finished at all. :shock:

Webb is an international collaboration with Europe and Canada (imagine all the bureaucracies involved). So far the budget has exceeded 8.5 billion (basically half of the NASA's budget). The congress was thinking about axing it altogether last year, since it's probably going to cost even more than that. But if they axe it they are left with nothing but a few billion's worth of junk (and thousands of unemployed PhDs).

The rest of the astro community who won't benefit from Webb largely hated it. Some were actually supporting the cut last year. When your proposal acceptance chance is dropping to 15% who cares about the ultimate fate of the universe?

Speaking of budget, the National Reconnaissance Office recently decided they no longer needed two spy telescopes and have donated them to NASA. Each one of them is comparable to Hubble. :shock: Now NASA has to beg around for the money to actually put them to use. A few billion is apparent just a small change for DoD and intelligence agencies.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... story.html

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 7:32
by tiffany
啥意思?天文望远镜用起来很花钱么?除了雇佣好朵好多好多PhD的开销?

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 8:19
by Jun
退休是指不干编辑了。哪有彻底退休不干活的好事呢?

Webb 和哈勃望远镜都是发到天上(地球轨道中)的,做起来就要很多人,发射又要很多人。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 9:03
by tiffany
没,你没看西门说我们得tax dollar at work,国家发射了间谍望远镜,退休俩,都跟哈勃一个级别....

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 9:23
by Jun
军方的钱更多啊,他们用的望远镜的技术和质量都比NASA高很多。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 14:09
by 笑嘻嘻
我觉得真逗。军方用哈勃水准的大镜头对着地球照,美国人太狠了!这不跟mib1里一样了,可以随便拉近在地球上找个人。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 14:16
by Jun
哈勃的镜头很老了,不如军方的镜头高级先进。军方的东西是最好最贵的了。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 14:40
by tiffany
你看过那个电影教啥国家公敌没?也是will smith主演,他躺着也中枪,有人把国家机密扔进他购物袋儿里了,然后一堆人追他,然后他就跑,跑到一特擅长藏起来得老头儿那儿。老头儿说不要打电话,不要发email,但凡跟现代社会沾边儿的通信手段都不要用,结果他还是没忍住,出门的时候用一公用电话给他女朋友还是老婆敲了个电话。然后就给找到了,人就追过来了,老头儿带着他跑,把藏身的一废工厂给炸了。will smith问:为什么?!老头儿愤慨的说:因为你打了个电话!

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 14:59
by 笑嘻嘻
看过。特喜欢。不过我从前都以为是艺术的夸张。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-15 15:01
by tiffany
我现在也以为那是艺术的夸张,真人早八年就给灭掉了,还能让他跑了。 :mrgreen:

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-16 0:35
by simonsun
所以俺觉得现代科技真是拜冷战所赐。不说是好是坏,冷战一结束,军方的研究结果一解密,民用技术哗啦啦上好几个台阶。

军方科研,有动力,不怕冒险,又有绝对的经济支持,新的研究结果一出来就敢给你做实验来应用。某将军一拍板,卫星立马上天。普通学校研究所哪里有这个条件来冒险,写proposal都是安全第一,在之前的结果上修修补补,自然进步缓慢。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-19 13:16
by simonsun
I like this guy's blog a lot. :-D

http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2012/06/1 ... gless-life
Stars, Planets And The Meaningless Life

by Adam Frank

This morning you woke up, got yourself through the morning routine and somehow managed to haul yourself to work. You did this yesterday and you will do it again tomorrow. The days come and they go. You do your best. You try not to hurt anyone, try to be helpful. But sometimes — just sometimes — the fog of real and imagined urgencies parts. Staring across the abyss of your own brief time on this world, you wonder, "Does any of this matter? Does any of it matter at all?"

I had that experience last week and I am still reeling.


I was attending the American Astronomical Society's summer meeting, held this year in Anchorage. Being in Alaska this time of year, with its in-your-face mountain ranges and near continuous daylight, is enough to yank anyone out of the day-to-day. But the 21 hours of daylight and the brief bear encounter (hello Mr. Enormous Black Bear) were not the keys that opened the door to the abyss for me.

It was an image, a single picture.

I was sitting in a morning session on the Kepler mission. Kepler is a small space telescope designed to find exo-planets, alien worlds orbiting other stars. Kepler has been very good at its job.

Kepler discovers new planets by staring at stars and looking for tiny periodic decreases in their brightness. Dips in starlight can occur for many reasons but if they happen in just the right way, over and over again, then astronomers know they've observed a planetary transit, a planet passing across the face of its host sun (yes, this is exactly what happened with Venus a few weeks ago).

Once the existence of the planet is established, astronomers can extract a cornucopia of information from the data. Using Kepler (and other observations) astronomers can nail down the size of the planet's orbit, its mass, its temperature and, sometimes, its density. The light that glances through its gaseous perimeter can even be used to determine the characteristics of the alien planet's atmosphere.

More than 72 new worlds have been discovered by Kepler, with a few thousand more considered candidates. Many of these are gas giants like Jupiter. Some are so-called Super-Earths, planets a few times larger than our own. Astronomers are not yet sure of their structure. Some may exist as wholly liquid water-worlds (that is why density measurements matter). A number of the Kepler discoveries are true planetary systems, with up to 6 worlds orbiting the host star. But most important of all, a few of Kepler worlds are the size of Earth. They are, most likely, rocky worlds like our own.

The talks on Kepler were delightful and I drank in all the new science like a thirsty kid on a hot summer day. But none of what I learned pushed me out of my comfort zone and on to the ledge of my own mortality. Then, innocently, one of the speakers flashed an image related to the Kepler search strategy.

It showed the region of sky where Kepler would be looking for its planets. The probability of a planet and star lining up just right for us to see a transit is pretty low (just 0.5% for system like the Earth and Sun). That means Kepler has to stare at a lot of stars for a long time. To accomplish this the team keeps the telescope pointed at just one region of sky in the constellation Cygnus.

That patch night is not very big. Your hand at the end of your outstretched arm held up against the sky pretty much covers it. The speaker also showed an image of the galaxy and how much of it Kepler would be able to explore. It was a tiny wedge set against a vast galactic disk of stars and dust.

That is what did it to me.

Those images catapulted me out of the room, out of the meeting, out of the day. It felt as if the floor of all my routine concerns dropped out from under me: the bills I forgot to pay before I left; the car brakes that need fixing when I get back; my relationship with my cousins; my concerns about the election; my concerns about the cough that is taking too long to go away; all of it just deflated against one single and inescapable fact.

In a small patch of sky, in a small wedge of space, there are worlds out there right now. There are, most likely many thousands of them. These are places just like here, places where you can stand and look around. These are places with landscapes. Many of them are barren and lifeless, but some may show the colors that only a biosphere can create. Either way, they exist right now as I write these words.

I was reeling and shaken to the core. For that one moment all the meaning and concern I schlep from one day to the next evaporated before my small place in this very big galaxy.

It was dizzying and it was delightful. To be human is to suffer great and small. Even given all our blessings, we can still find ways to fill the day with urgent concerns. And when great suffering falls to us — health, economic, family — our horizons constrict to darkness. Thus, for me, anytime I can be lifted from the crushing sense that this is all there is, it's a good thing. Anytime I can be reminded that there is more, so much more, than this mortal coil, it feels like a good thing.

One doesn't have to search the Kepler archive to find that feeling. It can arrive in the form of art, poetry, your kids laughter or just looking up and out. I hope you get a moment to do that today.

May you have a moment without meaning.

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-19 13:47
by tiffany
wow,这个就让我想到我上高中的时候看到的一个科幻小说,只见过译本,没见过原著,甚至都不知道原著是谁。讲埃及挖金字塔,挖出来一个木乃伊,照出来是一个完整的人,而非,你知道,传统的木乃伊。大家们很兴奋,慢慢把该人给拆出来,放医院里放几天,该人居然活了。当然他是外星人,当然他有超能力,当然他很痛苦。然后一个埃及人, :mrgreen: ,放他出去,该人就倒在天文望远镜旁边了。讲故事的人就爬到望远镜那儿一看,发现该人把望远镜坐标调过,对着一个很淡的星系,该星系的恒星的光芒达到地球走了很多很多很多年。

这个故事这么多年以来,一直都记得。很有助于我身体力行‘一夕风月,万古长空’的人生观。

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-19 16:18
by simonsun
tiffany wrote:很有助于我身体力行‘一夕风月,万古长空’的人生观。
是怎样身体力行的?我要把你的吃喝玩乐帖子都翻出来! :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Re: Stephen Hawkins @ Flint Center

Posted: 2012-06-19 19:14
by tiffany
得了,我们已婚有孩儿中年工作女性,还能怎么样?跟你们单身每天晚上看星星的小同志不能比的。 :mrgreen: