NY Times: MIT sues Gehry for building

入得谷来,祸福自求。
Post Reply
Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

NY Times: MIT sues Gehry for building

Post by Jun » 2007-11-08 11:18

Image

M.I.T. Sues Frank Gehry, Citing Flaws in Center He Designed
By ROBIN POGREBIN and KATIE ZEZIMA
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has sued the architect Frank Gehry and a construction company, claiming that “design and construction failures” in the institute’s $300 million Stata Center resulted in pervasive leaks, cracks and drainage problems that have required costly repairs.

The center, which features angular sections that appear to be falling on top of one another, opened to great acclaim in the spring of 2004. Mr. Gehry once said that it “looks like a party of drunken robots got together to celebrate.”

The lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages, was filed in Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston last week and first reported yesterday in The Boston Globe. It accuses Mr. Gehry’s firm, Gehry Partners, based in Los Angeles, of negligence and breach of contract in the design of the center, which houses laboratories, classrooms, offices and meeting rooms.

In an interview, Mr. Gehry, whose firm was paid $15 million for the project, said construction problems were inevitable in the design of complex buildings.

“These things are complicated,” he said, “and they involved a lot of people, and you never quite know where they went wrong. A building goes together with seven billion pieces of connective tissue. The chances of it getting done ever without something colliding or some misstep are small.”

“I think the issues are fairly minor,” he added. “M.I.T. is after our insurance.”

Mr. Gehry said he had received several expressions of support from people at the institute. “The professors and the people that we all did the building for are sending me e-mails dumbfounded that their institution is doing this,” he said.

Pamela Dumas Serfes, an M.I.T. spokeswoman, said, “As a matter of policy we don’t comment on pending litigation, and our lawsuit speaks for itself.”

Mr. Gehry has had to address problems with his buildings before. In December 2004, for example, he agreed to sandblast parts of his $274 million Walt Disney Concert Hall in Los Angeles in response to a report that found that the building’s skin produced excessive glare.

In the current case, he is joined as a defendant by the Stata Center’s builder, Skanska USA Building Inc., a New Jersey-based subsidiary of a Swedish company, Skanska AB. Jan Saragoni, a spokeswoman for Skanska USA, said, “Skanska values its relationship with M.I.T. and is looking forward to a speedy resolution of the matter.”

But Paul Hewins, executive vice president and area general manager of the company, told The Globe: “This is not a construction issue. Never has been.”

Mr. Hewins said Mr. Gehry had rejected Skanska’s formal request to revise the design for the center’s 350-seat outdoor amphitheater, whose poor drainage has been a large part of the problem.

The suit says that within months of the center’s opening, it essentially started coming apart, with “considerable masonry cracking” in the amphitheater’s seating areas.

In late 2006 and in 2007, M.I.T. hired a designer and a contractor to repair the amphitheater at a cost of more than $1.5 million, the suit says. The institute also discovered additional problems, its court papers say, like “sliding ice and snow from the building’s window boxes and other projecting roof areas, blocking emergency exits and damaging other building elements.”

Mr. Gehry said “value engineering” ― the process by which elements of a project are eliminated to cut costs ― was largely responsible for the problems.

“There are things that were left out of the design,” he said. “The client chose not to put certain devices on the roofs, to save money.”

Yesterday, brownish green mold was visible on the exterior of the Stata Center. Inside, the lobby’s concrete floors were cracked, but no leaking, mold or signs of structural deficiency were evident.

“It is a joy to work in this building,” said Rodney Brooks, a professor of robotics, “and I know that many of its occupants feel the same as I do about it. We asked Frank to give us a building that fostered communication, and he delivered.”

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2007-11-08 11:57

interesting. I wonder how it is going to turn out in this "he says, he says, he says" case.
有事找我请发站内消息

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2007-11-08 12:06

My brother's office was in the Stata center before he graduated, and I think everyone there was pretty grateful to have a new office to move into. Before that, they were in this old building that leaked and flooded on occasions. He did tell me in the winter time, huge (like really huge!) icicles would hang from the top of the buildings. Everytime people get out of the door, they have to look up and check no broken pieces of sharp ice is going to hit them. That's some health hazard, I say! I guess with Frank Ghery's office in LA, that's not the kind of problems they could have anticipated.

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2007-11-08 12:31

所以要请本地设计呀. 以前我们学校的一栋楼是东岸设计的, 没想到潮湿的冬天, 搞了玻璃幕墙, 没修完就发现长MOLD. 扒了重来, 10MILLION本来要装两个系的, 只修了一半装了一个系. 另一个系呆在危房里,到处募捐了好几年, 刚好又是DOT COM破灭, 校友也没啥钱, 最后总算筹够14MILLION修好, 五年都过去了.
好象越火的系院的楼越破,大概是没法中断教学科研, 维护为主. 和重要的高速特别破一个道理. 据说维修比修新的还贵.

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2007-11-08 12:50

我没这方面的知识,不过玻璃墙上也能长霉?
要想搬进新楼得有钱。 普通NSF & Darpa的款子不能用来搬家,连用来买家具设备的都有限。 这笔钱得来自其他组织或者私人捐款,这呢就要求实验室的头头有财路,能在外面找人来为搬新楼募捐。 象他们实验室的老板就特有路子,认得个香港富商愿出钱。 他付了两个米,学校把实验室的计算房命名为他。 其实就一件屋子,外面订个牌子说是xxx屋子。 厉害吧?

Post Reply