[八卦]麦姬张的新男友
一下。特此更正，罔顾伴侣需求的S。
看到鬼也不过就这效果
What do you care about what turns women on?simonsun wrote:还好老子基本分高。闷哼一声……Knowing wrote:念物理的男生倒扣四十分。
Say, Comrade Sun, what kind of men do you like?
(Everyone knows what I like by now.)
Comrade Mars is right --- Money speaks louder than most qualities, but is not engouh as the only quality for some (relatively young and still good-looking) women.
此喵已死，有事烧纸
One simple and perhaps most important assurance of a guy's masculinity is his attraction for the girls, i.e. his healthy, strong body, his mental toughness and courage, his ability to lead, to help, to protect, to entertain... I know this sounds cheesy and totally male-chauvinism but even most gay guys cannot help it... They tend to act more "masculine" around girls and see their charm for girls as a proof that they are indeed attractive-- although they might not be that aggressive like straight guys after all.Jun wrote:What do you care about what turns women on?
I'm just giving a gay guy's point of view. Pardon me for the cavalier attitude if there's any. I do care.
Violent delights.
Thank you for clarifying an important confusion that I've had for a long time! I think you meant "his attractiveness to women." That mades a huge chunk of sense. A man's position in the social hierarchy is defined by how competitively strong he is, and obviously his sexual power over women is a part of it. A similar measurement is how desirable his mate is --- how beautiful the girl on his arm is and how much he is other men's envy. It is a key understanding that I didn't get until you explained it. Very nice, comrade.One simple and perhaps most important assurance of a guy's masculinity is his attraction for the girls
Of course, similar competition and hierarchy exist among women -- the more desirable one is to men, the more respected, admired, and envied she is. Same phenomenon.
Another hypothesis that I've been toying with is that the underlying mechanism of male homosexuality, to a less than all-out degree, contributes to a man's sexual attractiveness to women. Women do not go for all testosterone machoness, but a blend of "soft" and "hard" qualities. I almost believe that some of the genetic "soft" qualities enhance a man's mating success, and only when these qualities go over a certain level that he becomes more attracted to men than to women.
此喵已死，有事烧纸
That is exactly what I meant. Sorry for my poor English!Jun wrote:Thank you for clarifying an important confusion that I've had for a long time! I think you meant "his attractiveness to women." That mades a huge chunk of sense. A man's position in the social hierarchy is defined by how competitively strong he is, and obviously his sexual power over women is a part of it. A similar measurement is how desirable his mate is --- how beautiful the girl on his arm is and how much he is other men's envy. It is a key understanding that I didn't get until you explained it. Very nice, comrade.One simple and perhaps most important assurance of a guy's masculinity is his attraction for the girls
Of course, similar competition and hierarchy exist among women -- the more desirable one is to men, the more respected, admired, and envied she is. Same phenomenon.
Another hypothesis that I've been toying with is that the underlying mechanism of male homosexuality, to a less than all-out degree, contributes to a man's sexual attractiveness to women. Women do not go for all testosterone machoness, but a blend of "soft" and "hard" qualities. I almost believe that some of the genetic "soft" qualities enhance a man's mating success, and only when these qualities go over a certain level that he becomes more attracted to men than to women.
Your other point is also spot on. At least I totally agree with it.
Violent delights.
Wow, this is totally new to me! You are saying that even when a man only fancies other men, even when he has zero sexual interests in women, he still wants to be perceived as attractive to women because that reflects upon his desirability? Hmm... I guess that makes sense. Being deemed desirable by the opposite sex is universally sought-after, like being pretty and being rich. It's always good, no matter what you intend to do in life.
There is something confusing here. What is the "underlying mechanism of male homosexuality"? By "soft" do you mean sensitivity? And are you equating sensitivity with homosexuality?Another hypothesis that I've been toying with is that the underlying mechanism of male homosexuality, to a less than all-out degree, contributes to a man's sexual attractiveness to women. Women do not go for all testosterone machoness, but a blend of "soft" and "hard" qualities. I almost believe that some of the genetic "soft" qualities enhance a man's mating success,
我的0.8分钱的理论是：假设人有许多个有正面功能和作用的基因，各自能让男人更sensitive，加强他们的mind-reading skills和empathy，增加文艺方面的倾向和能力，语言表达能力增强，同时aggression 降低。假设有二十个这样的基因，有效果的状态是on。如果一个人的所有这些基因都是off，他就是典型的不解风情男，直通通的clueless。如果一个男人这些基因里有一些是turned on，一些是 off，他的mating advantage 会提高，他对女性的吸引力，或者身价，会上升。但是如果二十个基因里有十八九个都是on，那么他就会对女性失去兴趣，而被男性吸引。这里面有一个continuum。感性，文艺，敏感，但是喜欢女性的，例如Billy Bob Thornton，James Dean，也是有的。这也能解释为什么弯男里有一个continuum，就是有些人不是绝对对女性没有兴趣，真遇到情投意合的也可以糊弄着过。但是另一些人就是Kinsey 所指的+6弯男。There is something confusing here. What is the "underlying mechanism of male homosexuality"? By "soft" do you mean sensitivity? And are you equating sensitivity with homosexuality?
这些基因拆开来看，都是对传宗接代有好处的，所以它们都能在长期的生存竞争里保存下来，而纯野人男并不最受欢迎。所以弯男也一直存在而不会被淘汰。
注意，这完全是我的猜想，没有科学根据的哈。
****************************************
忍不住贴一个：
此喵已死，有事烧纸
我不认识历史文人。我只认识一些现代男人，包括敏感体贴的直男。前面不是说了吗？如果只有某些性质，但缺少一些关键的配合基因，就不会是弯的呀。就好像很多有精神分裂症的人的直系亲属，也有某些共同的基因，而且有些跟schizophrenia有关联的基因现在有迹象表明跟创造力和想象力有关系。如果你只有A+B+C，而你的亲属正好是A+B+D，那么可能你是举世闻名的艺术家，而他是精神分裂症患者。如果一个人是A+S+C+L, 另一个人是A+S+C+M+N，那么前者可能是甜言蜜语而文艺而直的，后者可能是甜言蜜语而文艺而弯的。
文艺界里弯男多于大众中的比例，这是不争的事实。
Isn't he adorable?
昨晚看到第一第二集，挺好看的，Giamatti 和 Laura Linney 在一起很有化学作用，让我想找原著来读一读。这张剧照我觉得特别温柔，比张曼玉和德国建筑师那张浪漫多了，好看多了。
文艺界里弯男多于大众中的比例，这是不争的事实。
Isn't he adorable?
昨晚看到第一第二集，挺好看的，Giamatti 和 Laura Linney 在一起很有化学作用，让我想找原著来读一读。这张剧照我觉得特别温柔，比张曼玉和德国建筑师那张浪漫多了，好看多了。
此喵已死，有事烧纸
