原因
原因
2月初收到消息，我老人家折腾了n年的文章终于入围了，补俩实验再多讨论点儿事儿，基本上就发了。上周五老板给我一封email，内容只有一行：我们得赶紧把我们的文章给发了，付了一篇文章。周一在家收到，没有看文章，回老板话说本周五开始全天上班。昨天到了实验室，将文章打印出来，一看，哎，这个文章不就是我们那篇文章的图2吗！------ 当然人家做的仔细多了。看一看作者名单，赫然有我们投稿那个杂志的主编。吾乃恍然大悟这次投稿出奇顺利之深刻原因。后来老板电话过来，我跟他求证这个假设，他说：对我们没坏处，绝对没有坏处，呵呵呵呵呵。但是我们得引用这篇文献。
乡音无改鬓毛衰
She didn't get to put her name last either. Both the first and the last names on the author list were taken by the other study's investigators. I think this was a pretty obvious example of women being discriminated in research. OK I'm guessing here -- not only was she pressured to concede the first place but also because she is a less aggressive, less egotistical person who is less inclined to make a ruckus in a conflict. Women are nice (be it Nature or Nurture), so they are more likely to get bullied. 
此喵已死，有事烧纸
???:shock: Corresponding author is the one other researcher contact to talk about the result and further collaboration, and hence carry prestige in my field. When 2 paper got combined, often there will be notation that the first 2 arthors are both first authors listed in alphabetical order, and both PI are corresponding authors. Isn't that right, Tiff? Silkworm?
MMT
想当年，兄弟我在编辑部干活的时候，看见过很多不同的作者顺序。我们杂志不管，作者都是自己决定排名顺序。常见的是第一作者是干活最多的，最后一个作者是senior author，经常是实验室或者department 的老板挂个名。Corresponding author 多半是干活最多，手里掌握全部的数据，对细节最清楚的人。多数是第一作者，但有时第一作者是fellow, resident，或其他类型的临时工，所以senior author 接手作为contact person。我们编辑部里的人一般只要你这个corresponding author能及时回答reviewer问题，及时修改稿件，就行了，最怕一问三不知的corresponding author。所以很多时候作者的排名顺序根据他们学校或department 的规矩来定。there will be notation that the first 2 arthors are both first authors listed in alphabetical order, and both PI are corresponding authors
在这一篇Science的文章里，senior author (最后一个), first author, corresponding author 全是不同的人。备注说，两个研究的PIs "Equally contributed to the paper." 但是第二个研究的PI 的名字不是上面任何一个的位置，而且也不是alphabetical order。
Last edited by Jun on 2008-04-02 16:57, edited 1 time in total.
此喵已死，有事烧纸