[分享]Just for Laughs: Unhappy American in Italy

入得谷来,祸福自求。
Post Reply
Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

[分享]Just for Laughs: Unhappy American in Italy

Post by Jun » 2008-05-16 20:22

From Salon.com:
How I misspent my European vacation
My trip to Italy was perfect -- except for the part where I couldn't stop worrying about money, my children and the state of my marriage.

By Ann Bauer

May. 16, 2008 | Last summer, I was at a party where the conversation turned -- as it so often does among writers, artists and journalists -- to travel. In this crowd, people talk about Shanghai and Vienna and Puerto Rico (pronouncing it Pwer-toe, rolling the "R" knowledgeably) as easily as I might about Iowa or Wisconsin.

My husband, John, mentioned a backpacking trip through Spain that he took with his former wife, with whom he lived for a year in Barcelona; and though he is a software developer rather than an official member of the literati, this resulted in his being drawn cozily into the group. There was a long discussion about Basque food. Then a drunken filmmaker with a malicious glint in his eye turned to me and said, "So, where's he taken you?"

You know those playground bullies who could size you up immediately and figure out exactly which insult would hurt most? This guy was like that. We'd only just met, but he'd found it. My secret shame: I'm a writer who hasn't traveled much.

Sure, I've been all over the United States, and there was a study abroad program when I was 17: three months in London. But that was more than 20 years ago, and I'd returned to Europe only once as an adult, visiting Cambridge, Leeds, Edinburgh and Amsterdam. Compared with the crowd I run with, this is like summer camp at the Y.

They've mucked their way through Central America and the Far East. They've shopped in Moroccan markets and worked in clinics in Africa and slept with Thai hookers, both female and male. Many of the people I know prioritize travel above all else. I have a friend -- now in her 50s -- who confessed to me once that her need was so incurable, for decades she'd been booking trips she couldn't afford to places all over the globe, then calling her elderly parents in a panic when the money ran out and begging them to bring her home.

Meanwhile, I was messing around with the kids I started having at 21 and raised alone after my first husband bugged out. Scraping and saving, putting away what little I could for their college funds, taking them on Montana hiking vacations and tours of D.C. museums and driving trips along Cape Cod all the way to Provincetown. I loved all this, don't get me wrong. Still, I couldn't help lusting after my friends' adventures overseas.

Then along came this wonderful, well-traveled, bilingual man who cannot help the fact that he went to France and Egypt and Antarctica while I changed soiled diapers and went to school conferences and plays. And he wanted to raise those kids together: one who has autism and one who is going to college in the fall and one who is still in eighth grade. Now there isn't any money to travel. Not for me, and not for John, who -- until we met -- would think nothing of dropping $3,000 on a weekend motorcycling trip.

A few weeks after that party, however, we received a small, unexpected inheritance. It was found money, John said, and despite the bills and the kids and the leftover debt from his former spendthrift life, we should blow it all.

"I'm making reservations for Italy," he warned. And I, feeling the delicious thrill of the finally initiated (I, too, could be impetuous!), said, "Go ahead."

That was back when the euro was around $1.30. By the time we left, in mid-March, it was $1.56 and climbing. I tried not to worry.

But it was hard. There had been a crisis with our older son, and I'd spent most of February transferring him from one group home to another. Twice, I had wondered aloud if we should postpone the trip; John insisted the cost to change the tickets was prohibitive. Besides, he said, I needed this vacation more than ever. He would take care of everything, reading every word of "Rick Steves' Italy 2008" -- the guidebook that came highly recommended on NPR -- and planning. All I had to do was relax.

And for a couple of days, I did. Everything was perfect, from the flight out to the hotel in Rome. I spent my 42nd birthday on a rented Ducati riding through the hills of Umbria, a strange and glorious landscape that is a mixture of palm trees and firs. This, finally, was in keeping with my image of a writer. Hemingway and his Paris, Somerset Maugham and the South Pacific, Susan Sontag and ... everywhere.

Then things began to go wrong. It started with a tiny incident: a pot of tea we ordered from a small cafe near the Coliseum. The posted price was 3 euros, but when we stood from a small patio bench to pay, the barista charged us 8. "You sit," she said and waved toward the bench. "Is 8."

A few hours later, we left Rome bound for Orvieto, a storybook mountain village we'd ridden through the day before. We had to run for the train. Ten minutes into the hourlong trip, a conductor stopped to check our ticket and found it unstamped. The fine: 40 euros, though the station man had marked it clearly with that day's date.

By the time we arrived in Orvieto the sun was setting. What had looked the day before like an inviting cobblestone town with castlelike buildings and winding roads now was murky, a little forbidding. We towed our luggage through empty streets. The hotel that had been recommended was closed for renovation. Finally, we located a back alley place and showed the desk clerk our Rick Steves (guaranteed to take 10-20 percent off any listed price), but he only repeated his offer: 30 euros more than the book's high-season rate.

It was dark. The next train out wasn't for two hours. John shrugged and handed our passports and credit card to the man.

We went next door to a wine shop and picked up a bottle of Orvieto Classico, the citrusy white wine with notes of banana, kiwi and lime for which this region is famous. In our hotel room, John poured two glasses while I brought up our bank account online. It was Day Three of a 12-day trip and we'd already gone through 40 percent of our allotted funds.

"I budgeted before the euro went up," he pointed out. "Also, things cost more than the book said. So we're here; we'll just charge the overage and figure out how to pay it off when we get home."

In theory, I saw his point. You get to Italy once, maybe twice, in a lifetime; it doesn't make any sense to cut corners while you're there. Those people at the party we'd attended weren't worrying about mortgage payments while they were tramping through Marrakesh. And John had told me on our second or third date that he wanted to go everywhere -- see everything -- no matter what the price. I wavered.

But then I remembered the first tuition bill for our younger son's fall semester, which was sitting in our dining room, unpaid. I pondered the fact that our older son would always need financial support, and that we had at least five more years with our 13-year-old, which translates into $6,000 worth of pizza alone. And I became exactly who I'd always been: the dull, penurious, unadventurous mom.

"I can't do that," I said. "We need to figure out a way to make this money last."

There was one weepy, melodramatic moment when I offered to let John off the hook. We were, I told him, looking for entirely different things out of life. He should go on, have a great time in Italy. I would fly home and raise the three on my own -- which is what I'd intended to do up until the day he proposed.

"Don't be stupid," he said gently, taking the wine glass from my hand. "I think you've had enough to drink."

Indeed, the bottle was gone.

By the time we rose for dinner, we'd come up with a rough and severely scaled-back new plan. By cutting out two cities, we could make our original budget work. That and we would have enough to splurge on dinner. We walked to a nearby trattoria in renewed spirits, opening the door to a scented cloud of garlic, balsamic vinegar and roasted sage.

The place smelled wonderful, but even at 8 o'clock on a Thursday night, it was nearly empty. We sat at a corner table and ordered a flask of house wine out of courtesy; neither of us needed more. In fact, I was suddenly downright woozy. And after my first sip, the room began to spin.

I needed food. Immediately. The waiter arrived to take our order and set a basket of dry bread on the table. I picked up a slice and asked if I might have a plate and some olive oil. That's when there was a clattering, stick-splitting noise -- like a fence post breaking.

It was the owner, a man like Pinocchio's Stromboli: beefy, red-faced and mustached. He stood over me, hot breath on my head, barrel stomach pushing into my chair. "You order now!" he shouted, pointing at our menus, which were entirely in Italian with no English words underneath.

I had taken only a single bite of bread, so was still on the faintly nauseous side of drunk. But I put it down and picked up our translation guide. "OK, but I need to figure out ..."

"You order now!" This time it was a bellow. Everyone in the room turned to look. The man bumped my chair again and reached over my shoulder to bonk the menu with a finger like a fat cigar: antipasto, primo, secondo, contorno. He hit each category in turn. "You order. I am not in business of bread. You order now, or I call police."

In the United States, where I work as a restaurant critic, I would have written him off as a drunkard or a lunatic. I might have stood, thrown a few bills on the table, and walked out of the place. Or, as a friend suggested later, eaten the dinner peaceably, then called my credit card company to tell it what happened and insist that the charges be reversed. But I did none of these things.

Head spinning from the wine, off my game because English words -- my stock in trade -- were of no use, I did something entirely out of character. I apologized. Pointing to menu items that looked right, I weakly repeated my standard Italian phrase: Sono allergia ai funghi. "I am allergic to mushrooms."

The man sneered and nodded. Five minutes later, our food was dumped on the table in front of us, everything at once. The only sounds were forks clattering and a conversation in German at a four-top by the wall. We ate dutifully, like prisoners being watched.

That night, I awoke at 3 a.m., violently ill. The town was silent and dark. There was no one to call.

John and I spent the next week staying in small rented rooms and shopping in markets rather than going out. This saved money and ensured that we would never again go through an experience like Orvieto. And it was lovely, really: We sat on a double bed in a seaside room in Riomaggiore, a paper-thin towel spread between us, with a picnic of real prosciutto, soft taleggio cheese, fresh bread and blood oranges that dripped with juice.

Yet, as hard as I tried, I couldn't enjoy the romance of this without a parade of niggling doubts. I was stopping in tobacco shops all over Italy to buy phone cards so I could call the kids, worried that I'd left them motherless too long. This business of trampling through ancient cities with no goal in mind seemed slightly self-indulgent. And so much of what we'd seen -- around the Vatican particularly -- struck me as manipulative and Disney-fied. Plaster Pietà doorstops, light-up Pope Benedicts, Jesus-on-a-stick.

Often, we would find ourselves completely surrounded by other tourists: Asian men photographing their wives on bridges, gaggles of blond women from Texas, swarming groups of high school students with bored eyes and Celtic cross tattoos. We had gone to all this expense and trouble in order to experience a different culture. Yet a huge number of the people we encountered looked exactly like us: Americans toting guidebooks, fretting about the price of the euro and looking for deals. I was still wary, but part of me began to grow angry on the behalf of Italians, even the oaf from Orvieto. After dodging slow-moving sightseers all over Florence, I was ready to poison a few myself.

Before leaving -- once our return flight was within sight -- we spent two idyllic days in Lucca, a sweet, little magnolia-strewn village in north-central Italy. We'd gotten to the end of our trip with a couple of hundred dollars to spare, so John and I finally let go of the budget. We rode bicycles, stayed in a quaint bed-and-breakfast, dined out on fagioli with braised arugula and roasted duck. Everywhere we went, we were welcomed like family. The owner of the B&B invited us to use her personal computer; the waiter at the restaurant demurred when we tried to leave him a 20 percent tip.

Back home this was what we talked about. Like real travelers, we raved about the beautiful trees, quaint brick-walled town and authentic Tuscan food. Then sometimes, after a few glasses of wine, we would tell the Orvieto story, too. But we made it funny rather than sinister, imitating the restaurant owner, making him into a colorful character in our own private Italian tale. It became one of those quirky, vivid memories two married people share.

Deep down, though, my doubts remained. I knew that if John were still throwing money around -- as he did when he was taking exotic wildlife tours, trekking through the Arctic on a second mortgage, extending his trip to the Middle East because the scuba diving was really good -- he would have been treated well throughout Italy and probably had a much better time. And I worried about what that meant. Had he stayed single, my now husband would have had the option after Orvieto to throw the Rick Steves book in the garbage, pull out his platinum AmEx, and find a fancy hotel with real linens and a bathroom en suite.

Instead, he spent much of his vacation calculating the costs of museum admissions and trains, then standing outside phone booths while I was on hold for the group-home director or negotiating with our daughter about whose house she could go to after school. Perhaps, I thought, our trip was the turning point, that critical juncture when he realized the enormity of his trade. Surely there was a limit to the value of warmth and family when unconquered countries were at stake.

After we arrived home I watched John, quietly, as we went back to what was, only two and a half years ago, my life. I was a little distant, on guard. If he was about to tell me this marriage was constricting, too much responsibility and routine, I wanted to be ready. It was during this period -- at another party, nearly identical to the one last fall -- that I overheard a magazine publisher sigh longingly and ask John what it was like to live in Spain.

He paused and I waited, thinking about all the possible answers he might give and imagining the mean guy from that earlier party materializing to chime in, "Yeah, what's it like to go from that to group-home conferences and college orientation sessions and teenage girls screaming because they're having a Heath Ledger film festival in the basement?"

I edged closer. Finally, I heard my husband's low drawl. "Lonely," he said. "Honestly, it was one of the worst times in my life."

I crept away, but a few minutes later, John came and found me. Our daughter had called him on his cellphone. She and her friends were sick of TV and in the mood for Ben & Jerry's. Could we pick some up?

"C'mon," he said, touching my shoulder. "I really want to go home."

-- By Ann Bauer

[Jun's commentary: Guess anyone can be a paid writer on a national publication --- albeit online publication.]
此喵已死,有事烧纸

火星狗
Posts: 3171
Joined: 2006-03-03 13:56

Post by 火星狗 » 2008-05-16 21:30

I like it because I am mean. They really should publish a book: unhappy trips, around the world. :mrgreen:

ravaged
Posts: 494
Joined: 2003-12-06 0:16

Post by ravaged » 2008-05-17 5:39

well she sublimes love and marriage the same way her friends do travel. :mrgreen: i sympathize, though; she wouldn't have enjoyed the trip at all if she didn't cut back. there's no point going against people's natural dispositions.
Now that happy moment between the time the lie is told and when it is found out.

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-05-17 8:14

我贴这个是因为,这篇文章是一个很典型的例子,表面上好像是关于X(旅行,欧洲,意大利),实际上是关于Y (作者的心理,价值观,处世待人的态度)。一个人的性格和心理影响到一切的处境,对外界的环境的反应和解释---家里还是外面,恋爱中还是失恋中,上班还是下班。人的行为和感受,也许自以为是XX让我幸福/痛苦/烦恼/快乐等等,原因实际上还是自己而不是别人或者环境。

这又是另一个典型,就是写文章很难掩藏自己的真面目,即使作者并不太看得清自己,即使她的文章充满了自己眼光的哈哈镜,读者仍然能看到她自己都拒绝承认的自己。
此喵已死,有事烧纸

火星狗
Posts: 3171
Joined: 2006-03-03 13:56

Post by 火星狗 » 2008-05-17 8:51

我觉得中间一段还是略有点自省精神的,结尾真是很读者文摘。事实上这篇也就比读者文摘深了那么一点点。

她一开头讲的那段旅行的peer pressure也有点意思。

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-05-17 10:33

这人真是个彻头彻尾的loser! :shock:
有事找我请发站内消息

幻儿
Posts: 1636
Joined: 2007-07-31 10:47

Post by 幻儿 » 2008-05-17 16:11

看了几段就看不下去了,觉得这个人怎么这么讨厌,最莫名其妙的是为什么jun会贴这个,是不是后面渐入佳境?又忍着看了几段,终于忍无可忍,跳下去看回帖。
以后我也得先看回帖才是,就不用忍这么辛苦。 :mrgreen:
我无比同情John,同女主人公这样的人旅行真痛苦。

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-05-17 16:42

我很无辜地说,题目上已经给了线索了啊,just for laughs. :cat88:
此喵已死,有事烧纸

笑嘻嘻
Posts: 23477
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:00

Post by 笑嘻嘻 » 2008-05-17 18:42

我知道 Jun 为什么贴,她在文章后面的评论里写得很清楚了:Jun's commentary: Guess anyone can be a paid writer on a national publication --- albeit online publication.

这得这么烂都能当全国报章上的专刊作家(她是专刊作家吧?)!瞧把 Jun 给气的。
不过你可以说她目光狭隘、小市民、浅显。但她倒是写得比较真实,没有太多掩饰她的完全不享受。总有很多一样想法的人愿意看呗。
云浆未饮结成冰

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-05-17 19:23

很真实。

其实最revealing 的细节跟意大利无关,而在于作者对其他同行的态度,对丈夫和儿女的态度,等等。很有代表性。

反省一下,我不应该讥笑跟自己性格差别很大的人。 :dog001:
此喵已死,有事烧纸

幻儿
Posts: 1636
Joined: 2007-07-31 10:47

Post by 幻儿 » 2008-05-17 19:40

题目的提示没仔细看,当然跳到最后面jun的提示和回帖当然就明白啦。 :cat88:
我觉得吧,登这篇文章最重要的原因是应景--现在又到了vacation planning season。这篇文章整体感觉很defensive。我觉得真实的部分是:在美国当中产阶级不容易啊:现在经济不好,有人房贷还不起,有人子女上大学,飞机票看涨,可到了夏天还是要面临旅行度假的压力。大约很多中产阶级觉得因为经济原因不能出国或者去exotic的地方度假,是比较不好意思的事情。这个作者出来替他们辩护说:在外国既不舒服又孤单,只不过是无聊party上某些obnoctious的人的谈资;即使我们有钱,我们也不希罕去!中产阶级读者看了就觉得心理平衡多了。--这个作者也是在进行心理治疗呢。 :mrgreen:

森林的火焰
Posts: 2913
Joined: 2005-09-08 9:45
Contact:

Post by 森林的火焰 » 2008-05-17 20:30

不知道为什么,这个女人和她丈夫让我想起In Bruges里非要爬钟楼的那对美国夫妇 :mrgreen:
http://harps.yculblog.com
搬家了搬家了

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-05-17 21:23

幻儿 wrote:题目的提示没仔细看,当然跳到最后面jun的提示和回帖当然就明白啦。 :cat88:
我觉得吧,登这篇文章最重要的原因是应景--现在又到了vacation planning season。这篇文章整体感觉很defensive。我觉得真实的部分是:在美国当中产阶级不容易啊:现在经济不好,有人房贷还不起,有人子女上大学,飞机票看涨,可到了夏天还是要面临旅行度假的压力。大约很多中产阶级觉得因为经济原因不能出国或者去exotic的地方度假,是比较不好意思的事情。这个作者出来替他们辩护说:在外国既不舒服又孤单,只不过是无聊party上某些obnoctious的人的谈资;即使我们有钱,我们也不希罕去!中产阶级读者看了就觉得心理平衡多了。--这个作者也是在进行心理治疗呢。 :mrgreen:
这你就错了。她的中心思想跟中国老式妇女的那套如出一辙:我是粒含辛茹苦的单身母亲,我度假还把孩子的教育放在心上;文学圈子里大多数人喜欢炫耀自己的旅游经历;他们(跟我丈夫一样)都是不负财务责任的成年孩子;要是我有钱扮大方(象我们在意大利最后两天),也会处处受欢迎。我牺牲了自己。
有事找我请发站内消息

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-05-17 21:48

说不定还埋怨丈夫把一小笔继承款都浪费在意大利上面,所以写了这篇文章来出气。

嫉妒圈子里其他“作家艺术家”,所以形容他们都是乱花父母的钱或者跟泰国妓女、妓男睡觉或者恶意欺负她弱女子的坏人。自己是圣女matyr。

没钱就别去玩儿啊,讨厌他们就别老凑上去跟他们混哪。自己不会玩,不敢玩,难道还要怪到意大利头上,对她照顾不周到?
此喵已死,有事烧纸

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2008-05-17 22:48

The posted price was 3 euros, but when we stood from a small patio bench to pay, the barista charged us 8. "You sit," she said and waved toward the bench. "Is 8."
:lol: Obviously she didn't do her homework-it was her husband who read Rick Steves.

笑嘻嘻
Posts: 23477
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:00

Post by 笑嘻嘻 » 2008-05-17 23:00

没钱当然也可以出去玩。我记得有篇前年挺流行的游记,作者好像叫大勇和小花,后来哪个电台还采访他们。他们详细地列了自己去欧洲自助游的花费,非常少。住青年旅馆吃最便宜的饭。但并没有影响他们享受当时的心情。(我记得有个中国人的游记里有写他就是在罗马住修道院,很有意思。rick steves 也介绍了这种便宜住法。)她这篇挺有意思的,她其实对意大利本身没什么兴趣,对罗马的博物馆更没有兴趣,但她一定要去了,并且意大利是她出国旅行的首选。去博物馆给她唯一的印象就是换算成美元涨价了的票价。所以本来她完全可以跳过美术馆的费用,把钱花在吃上。但她一定要到此一游。基本她出去玩就是前面大家讲的 peer pressure。并且她甚至把任何跟 rick steves 书上价钱不符的地方都当作受了骗的不愉快经历。(真典型啊,我不知道为什么会这么想。)rick steves 的书里相比lonely planet,介绍背景故事的少,基本内容都是怎么找deal,怎么花少钱玩好,千万别上当。是一本不能够让人单从阅读上产生乐趣的书。纵然是为生活疲于付账的中年中产阶级,大概也不能够忍受青年旅馆了吧,总是要娇贵一下自己身体。这就挺尴尬的,既已经没有体力吃苦,又不够足够的经济实力保证出门跟在家一样的舒适。(她的标准显然是要跟家里一样,最后好的几天就是“Everywhere we went, we were welcomed like family. ”)
云浆未饮结成冰

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2008-05-17 23:08

不过我怪同情她. 我带宝宝出门旅行也时常很悲惨, 不带呢是玩好了但难免有内疚感. 这故事里加上经济压力恐怕就更焦虑了. 出门想省钱是MI, 还白白浪费好时光.
美国中产阶极现在是不好过, 尤其是有孩子的双工作家庭. 存钱的人看周围别人都使劲花钱肯定需要找点心理补偿. :monkey001:专栏作家好象挣的很一般, 肯定达不到SATC的期望值 8)

Jun
Posts: 27816
Joined: 2003-12-15 11:43

Post by Jun » 2008-05-18 8:12

存钱的人看周围别人都使劲花钱肯定需要找点心理补偿.
难道不是存钱的人看周围别人花钱感到道德优越感?

又要优越又要嫉妒,就没法子了。
此喵已死,有事烧纸

森林的火焰
Posts: 2913
Joined: 2005-09-08 9:45
Contact:

Post by 森林的火焰 » 2008-05-18 8:25

她不就是存不下钱才这么愤怒的么,如果能存下,不用交学费,还房贷,没准儿就高兴了。
“六千美元的pizza",我真替她的孩子忧虑每天都吃些什么,不过她肯定觉得自己是超级好妈妈。
http://harps.yculblog.com
搬家了搬家了

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-05-18 8:49

道德优越感,她就是靠这个挣扎的活到了今天 :mrgreen:
有事找我请发站内消息

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2008-05-18 12:15

We went next door to a wine shop and picked up a bottle of Orvieto Classico, the citrusy white wine with notes of banana, kiwi and lime for which this region is famous. In our hotel room, John poured two glasses while I brought up our bank account online. It was Day Three of a 12-day trip and we'd already gone through 40 percent of our allotted funds.
Orvieto都倒到杯里了还不能享受! :shock: 当她老公真不容易。
其实谁出门没被骗过/抢过/吃过顿不合算的饭了,出门旅游就这样,有高有低, 要想一分多余的钱都不花待在家看碟算了。
Image

森林的火焰
Posts: 2913
Joined: 2005-09-08 9:45
Contact:

Post by 森林的火焰 » 2008-05-18 12:35

我前两天在nature上看到一篇报道,讲美国一个做葡萄遗传性状研究的女教授做了十几二十年以后,宣布退出学院这一行改到加州跟她丈夫一起经营酒庄。她说原因是:尽管葡萄是十分重要的经济作物,但是为葡萄争取经费却十分困难,很大部分因为美国的清教徒传统认为饮酒是罪恶的。相比之下,她说,在欧洲对葡萄研究的态度就自然得多,因为葡萄酒是生活的一部分,象吃饭一样,没有什么罪恶附在上头。
这种从干扰他人的生活,让他人和自己一样痛苦中获得满足感,可能就是清教徒式生活的快乐来源吧。
http://harps.yculblog.com
搬家了搬家了

豪情
Posts: 21256
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:47

Post by 豪情 » 2008-05-18 13:11

她和JOHN磨合挺不容易的. 一般SPENDER和SAVER一起生活后会更走极端,双方精神压力都很大.最好还是志同道合一起花钱/存钱.

CAVA
Posts: 8169
Joined: 2003-12-06 16:55

Post by CAVA » 2008-05-18 13:45

这么又酸又苦的别扭文章,看了要消化不良的。她平时估计就是这个风格,到了pressure超大时,爆发得更厉害些。可怜意大利当了她的出气桶。最后的结尾太不可信了。

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-05-18 17:21

karen wrote:
其实谁出门没被骗过/抢过/吃过顿不合算的饭了,出门旅游就这样,有高有低, 要想一分多余的钱都不花待在家看碟算了。
中国老话说穷家富路,就是这个理儿。
有事找我请发站内消息

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2008-05-18 17:43

豪情 wrote:她和JOHN磨合挺不容易的. 一般SPENDER和SAVER一起生活后会更走极端,双方精神压力都很大.最好还是志同道合一起花钱/存钱.
真这样。 我有对朋友一个是spender一个是saver, 两人吵了两年后就离婚了。 后来spender找了个比他更能花钱的, saver找个了跟她一样俭朴的, 两人都过得很幸福。
Image

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-05-19 9:12

其实我相信作者在生活中没那么糟--真遇到他们
有事找我请发站内消息

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2008-05-19 14:31

你不喜欢这个夫妇关系模式,不能怪电影演得难看嘛。 毕竟这样的relationship不少, 而且咱这个社会提倡everybody deserves to be happy.
Image

Knowing
Posts: 34487
Joined: 2003-11-22 20:37

Post by Knowing » 2008-05-19 14:41

这对夫妻关系挺真实的。电影不好看是因为没什么TWIST,一览无余。大家都说对话很有趣,我怎么没觉得,都是爆米花笑料,不太可笑,又没回味又没意思,闷死人。要不是已经付了PAY PER VIEW 的钱早就转台了。本来我对它的期望值也就是在SUPERBAD 和LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE 之间,结果比SUPERBAD 还难看!
有事找我请发站内消息

karen
Posts: 3020
Joined: 2003-11-22 18:51

Post by karen » 2008-05-19 15:07

嗯,这电影是没啥twist滴。 我觉得特象电影版的gilmore girls, 女孩嘴特快。
Image

Post Reply