抱怨
抱怨
1。google map
古狗地图找地方还是挺好使的,不过有个地方作的真让人抓狂。话说我找农场,只知道纽约州,河头地区和农场名字。然后我就把这些信息敲进去,然后他就找着了,然后我问他怎么去那儿,他就告诉我他不明白我要去哪儿。我就忍不住质问狗狗:什么叫你不明白这个地址?!你找着它的!
这个方面还是switchboard作的好,他准能找到地方。
2。国家地理杂志
本期杂志真难看,第一篇文章讲stem cell,还算科普;接下来讲污染和旅游业对某地的侵蚀污染,然后一个重头文章讲车臣局势,第一张彩照居然是一个小孩葬礼。这个小孩2岁,早半年车臣恐怖分子劫持学校人质的死难者。这张照片的中心就是这个小孩躺在小棺材里,脑袋旁边放了个玩具。还有一个小孩儿瞪着无辜的大眼睛看着镜头---两条腿象竹竿一样,不知道什么东西闹的。看的人心里又难受又堵得慌。mmd,老子要是想看这些让人郁闷的新闻照片,我就去看新闻去了,干什么要看国家地理!
古狗地图找地方还是挺好使的,不过有个地方作的真让人抓狂。话说我找农场,只知道纽约州,河头地区和农场名字。然后我就把这些信息敲进去,然后他就找着了,然后我问他怎么去那儿,他就告诉我他不明白我要去哪儿。我就忍不住质问狗狗:什么叫你不明白这个地址?!你找着它的!
这个方面还是switchboard作的好,他准能找到地方。
2。国家地理杂志
本期杂志真难看,第一篇文章讲stem cell,还算科普;接下来讲污染和旅游业对某地的侵蚀污染,然后一个重头文章讲车臣局势,第一张彩照居然是一个小孩葬礼。这个小孩2岁,早半年车臣恐怖分子劫持学校人质的死难者。这张照片的中心就是这个小孩躺在小棺材里,脑袋旁边放了个玩具。还有一个小孩儿瞪着无辜的大眼睛看着镜头---两条腿象竹竿一样,不知道什么东西闹的。看的人心里又难受又堵得慌。mmd,老子要是想看这些让人郁闷的新闻照片,我就去看新闻去了,干什么要看国家地理!
乡音无改鬓毛衰
为什么败下?silkworm wrote:小声儿问一句:你们谁看《纽约客》么?
我外出旅行,在飞机场买着看,努力了几次,终于败下阵来,不再嚷嚷着要订阅了。

著名的小汉的博里看到
下山走十分种不到, 在日落大道的车站上车, 公司门口下车, 非常方便. 那天出门倒垃圾时在邻居垃圾桶里无意中发现几本纽约客, 都是近期的, 马上塞进包里, 带在车上看. 再没有比公车更适宜看这种杂志的场所了. 昨天看到一篇讲公寓跳蚤的, 非常搞笑, 我在车上忍无可忍, 爆笑. 自己也刚订了这份杂志, 还没寄到. 早知邻居垃圾桶里有货我就不订了, 在他家门口贴张条子, 让他看完塞进我家邮箱就好了. 这邻居真不错, 无线上网的网络也是开放的, 等我过几个月注销掉自己的账户, 去他网里作寄生虫.
Re: 抱怨
我很同情的说,为虾米古狗8明白滴事情,你却要质问狗狗呢?tiffany wrote:1。google map
古狗地图找地方还是挺好使的,不过有个地方作的真让人抓狂。话说我找农场,只知道纽约州,河头地区和农场名字。然后我就把这些信息敲进去,然后他就找着了,然后我问他怎么去那儿,他就告诉我他不明白我要去哪儿。我就忍不住质问狗狗

Perhaps we grows very strong, stronger than Wraiths.
Lord Smeagol? Gollum the Great? The Gollum!
Eat fish every day, three times a day, fresh from the sea.
Lord Smeagol? Gollum the Great? The Gollum!
Eat fish every day, three times a day, fresh from the sea.
New Yorker is good but too wordy. Reading each issue takes as much effort as reading a book. I might as well read a good book.
Architect Digest is safe entertainment to me -- Reading sth you might be able to afford is always dangerous. I would compare them to Going to Museum Vs Going Shopping. Museum is safe because even though the objects are priceless, you walk out and forget about them. Going to Saks Fifth Avenue, a random glimpse might turn into a close look, then a casual "I am just trying this cute pair on", and before you know, your credit card is out of the wallet
Architect Digest is safe entertainment to me -- Reading sth you might be able to afford is always dangerous. I would compare them to Going to Museum Vs Going Shopping. Museum is safe because even though the objects are priceless, you walk out and forget about them. Going to Saks Fifth Avenue, a random glimpse might turn into a close look, then a casual "I am just trying this cute pair on", and before you know, your credit card is out of the wallet

有事找我请发站内消息